A World is Thinking… Voices rising to create an alternative to the Global Economy

A World is Thinking… Voices rising to create an alternative to the Global Economy

The Editor (and a founding member) of The Harmony Community (THC); has no intention of supporting any political party… regardless of the fact the  article we have re-published here comes to a political conclusion. It does however make many well-formed arguments in relation to the principles of injustice inherent in Capitalism and the WTO specifically. The original article was penned in 2002. Out of date? I would ask the reader to specifically consider… What progress has the world of politics made towards achieving its author’s original and obvious aims? Aims I feel sure we all can agree with… It was written 15 years ago!

My argument is; ZERO! In fact quite the opposite is evident. As such is illustrates overwhelmingly the system that exists – is rigged. While this conclusion may come as no surprise, the suggestion we within the Harmony Community feel is important to acknowledge may well be:- You cannot beat a rigged game… you can only refuse to play!

At THC we believe the time has come to set up independent communities capable of being so self-sustainable they are capable of thriving while completely boycotting the system. A system ruled-over by an  international cabal of crony capitalists which is manipulating mankind through it’s financial hegemony. We also believe, we have chesive society templates that can be adopted, even within urban-communities, struggling to survive the job losses of corporate out-sourcing and labour saving devices – Ai automation. The corporate world is freely advertising that less than half of existing employees, will be needed by 2030. What are the institutions offering to offset this trend? Austerity. The austerity measures being implemented by organisations like the IMF are forcing governments to cut social benefits. The implications are dire for the man in the street. As opportunity dwindles – the safety net is being dismantled. Do people (do you) really want your survival to become entirely dependent on corporate tax-gathering (an issue in itself) and the generosity of your governments? Governments which are clearly in the thrall of a collusive relationship with corporations and their banking financiers. Surely its a recipe for disaster… and hopefully the people are listening.

Is the initiative this website represents – A cry in the dark? Too little, too late…?

Perhaps not, there area growing number of attempts by an awake and aware people to speak up. Trying to form groups that can influence governments and international institutions. Much networking is required if these grass-roots efforts to develop a forum with a meaningful voice. Is Big-Government listening? At THC we believe strongly that as long as we are only trying to effect change ONLY from the top down these governments can and will ignore the outcry for sane and ethical leadership.

We encourage the “disenfranchised” to become independent.

Its vital to recognise that we are ALL becoming disenfranchised!

Our aim is to provide a template of achievable independence that does not require participation in the system. I.E. communities that no longer fuel the engine of economic disparity. To offer empowering financial options while providing the residents of these communities a real opportunity for gainful employment, food, water and health security. Communities that have vital access to ample clean water, food and quite possibly remedial alternatives to the profiteering offerings of Big-Pharma.

Just as important, a blue-print for societal management that is interactive at grass roots level. One that reverses the top-down approach of the present disengaged control method. (The details of which can be found all over this website.) At THC we are seeking to share our successes and unpack the challenges that go with setting up communities of this nature. Creating a net-worked sharing type of economy*. There are now crypto-currency and block-chain possibilities that did not exist at the time this author penned the article below. These new technologies offer dynamic options which promise many new marketing and genuinely free-trading possibilities. We suggest the reader compare these possibilities with the top-down approach suggested by the article below. Grass-roots guidance is required to help the new communities realise their farmer/cottage industry initiatives. There is an emerging marketplace – a demand from new consumers seeking both organic and local produce. Simply put, an opportunity exists – one that can serviced by the old pioneering spirit combined with modern approaches, incorporating the valuable lessons of applied best practice and the trade/sales potential that now presents itself. This is – entreprenurial approach that once drove what became the capitalist economy. These Sales Opportunities, the existing mono-crop and corporate branded industries simply will not be able to meet. Why – because the very nature of organic production is at odds with the business model of Big-Agriculture. This is true also of the whole logistics model that supports the heavily industrialized food industry.

We also feel strongly that the present mono-crop agribusiness culture is a TRAP. One binding the traditional farmer to the Big-Agriculture with its highly controlled harvest, transport and retail logistics. This entrapment to the corporate controlled system is destroying independent farmers, large and small across the world. The United Nations produces some lovely PR pointing out these problems. It is however duplicitous! As an organisation it’s recommendations do not align with its policies. It ignores the true culprits on the one hand, while waxing lyrical about food sustainability and a water crisis. It does so in a manner strongly suggestive it is all the fault of consumers! When clearly consumers are merely purchasing what they are offered… and due to monopolized market logistics it is often their only option. Real choice is steadily being reduced to zero in the powerful retail arena. Supported of course by overwhelming corporate advertising driving the consumer principle.

At THC we suggest, Sustainable independance enables us, the consumer, to boycott the profiteering control mechanisms? It is true this is a big idea, it is an idea I suggest whose time has come. Institutionalised regulation is literally sucking the life blood out of our communities. Industrialized agriculture is dessicating and poisoning the landscape – A rainfall is sorely needed for people the world-over.  Those tasked with cultivating human society are denying what they have created. It seems they have no intention of changing course.

Please note the original article (below) as referred to in the lead-in : You will find a small number of THC [Editor’s inserts] emphasizing the points raised above.


by David C. Korten
The People-Centered Development Forum

Money or life? Which will be the object of our devotion?

The organizing principle of our governing institutions? The standard against which we measure our accomplishment? This was the real issue at stake when tens of thousands of people from around the world gathered in Seattle at the end of November to stop the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) deadly assault against democracy, humanity, and the planet.

eNRICHES THE 1 PERCENTAs the WTO champions a new world order in which money rules, the old politics of left and right give way to a new politics defined by a choice between money and life as the measure of our lives and institutions. Will we give ourselves over to roles serving money as consumers and workers in a competitive global economy ruled by global corporations and financial speculators? Or will we act as whole human beings — citizens of planet earth — with the right and responsibility to create a planetary society ruled by people to the benefit of the whole of life?

The Global Capitalist Economy. 

In a capitalist regime, money is embraced as the measure of all value. The maximization of returns to financial capital becomes society’s defining goal. Competition, individualism, and materialism are nurtured as favored cultural norms. Stock prices and gross domestic product (GDP) are the accepted measures of progress and well being. Inflation of land and stock values is encouraged, while wages are held constant or depressed, thus creating ever growing inequality by increasing the financial assets of a small elite relative to the incomes of working people.

Inequality and injustice are not accidental outcomes of global capitalism, they are its defining characteristics.

Capitalism trains and selects as its leaders those imbued with a highly developed financial consciousness — “think money.” Its favored institution is the publicly traded, limited liability corporation, which concentrates power in the hands of a chief corporate executive accountable only to absentee owners. [Owners] who themselves are shielded from public accountability for the decisions made on their behalf. With a legal fiduciary responsibility to maximize short-term returns to its shareholders. The legal structure of the corporation virtually compels it to mimic a cancer — pursuing its own unlimited growth without regard to consequences for either itself or its host.

Though living capital — human, social, institutional, or natural — is the ultimate source of all real wealth. Capitalism assigns it NO VALUE and makes no accounting for its depletion. The ultimate power over both governments and corporations resides with global financial markets in which speculators gamble with hundreds of billions of dollars in borrowed money. [Money borrowed today, at virtually zero interest – and reloaned onwards to society at usury rates!] Corporate ownership of media and politicians renders democracy meaningless as the institutions of money rewrite laws to free themselves from public regulation, economic borders, and restraint on their ability to eliminate competition through mergers, acquisitions, and strategic alliances.

Meanwhile the WTO, a body created at the instigation of the world’s largest corporations to serve their financial interests, has been given the power to challenge local and national laws that conflict with its view of global priorities. Through the WTO the world’s rich and powerful aggressively advance the negotiation and enforcement of international agreements to place the protection of property rights ahead of the protection of human rights. [They force] governments to prohibit them from regulating global corporations and finance, remove barriers to the spread of a homogenized corporate-friendly consumer culture, mold all countries into a standardized laissez-faire capitalist economic model. Press governments to privatize public goods and services, assuring global corporations [have] unrestricted access to natural resources, and provide public guarantees for private investors and speculators. [The broader public is constantly being restrained from using these resources – in fact… buerocracy constantly legislating agianst individuals trapping things like water on thier own property!]

Capitalism is by definition a system that concentrates economic power in the hands of the few to the exclusion of the many — creating an illusion in the minds of power holders that it is an engine of prosperity rather than an engine of destruction and upward redistribution. [15 years later the evidence overwhelmingly supports the author’s concerns]

The increasingly shaky legitimacy of this flawed economic model rests in large measure on two well promoted fallacies:

  • Fallacy 1: The fairest and most effective way to end poverty is to expand the economic pie through economic growth, thus improving the standard of living of everyone. Reality: The economic growth we currently experience is destroying the real living wealth of society and the planet, thus reducing the pie of real wealth.
  • Fallacy 2: The global victory of capitalism is a victory for democracy and the market economy — which is the fairest and most efficient mechanism for allocating economic resources.Reality: Democracy and market economies are exactly what we should be seeking, because they are the foundation of equitable, self-organizing societies. Unfortunately, capitalism is the mortal enemy of both. Capitalism is by definition a system that concentrates economic power in the hands of the few to the exclusion of the many — creating an illusion in the minds of power holders that it is an engine of prosperity rather than an engine of destruction and upward redistribution.
Consider the possibility of a planetary society in which LIFE is the measure of value… A Planetary Society [of independantly sustainable communies]

Consider the possibility of a planetary society in which life is the measure of value and the defining goal is to assure the happiness, well-being, and creative expression of each person. Well-being and progress are evaluated on the basis of indices of the vitality, diversity, and productive potential of the whole of society’s living capital — its human, social, (institutional?) and natural capital. These indices are monitored as carefully as we now monitor GDP and stock prices. Any sign of decline evokes prompt corrective action. Leaders are trained and selected for their highly developed planetary consciousness — “think living planet.”

Human rights and political sovereignty reside in real persons on the basis of one person one vote. [Not the gerry-mandered manipulation that now passes for democracy.] Civic associations facilitate the practice of direct democracy [Operating at greatly decentralised level – wherein the people can remain engaged ] Public funding of elections and free access for political candidates to media minimize the role of money in elections.

Economic life centers on well regulated, self-organizing markets that function within a strong ethical culture of cooperation and mutual responsibility. Some call it the mindful market economy. Firms are human-scale and owned by real human stakeholders — their workers, customers, suppliers, and community members. There are many forms of enterprise, including proprietorships, cooperatives, partnerships, and stakeholder owned corporations — but the once common publicly traded, limited-liability corporation no longer exists.

The right of each person to a means of livelihood is considered to be the most basic of human rights — a right secured in part through owning a share in the assets on which one’s livelihood depends. Concerns for equity and public accountability are hallmarks of economic life.

Money is [supposed to be] society’s servant, not its master, and is used solely to facilitate productive investment and beneficial exchange. Its creation is a public function. Financial speculation is strongly discouraged by regulation and tax policy. Local currencies are common, as are independent community banks and credit unions. Thus, finance is predominantly local, as are most enterprises and most production. Countries trade their surplus production based on their comparative natural endowments.

Urban sky farm copy

The right of each person to a means of livelihood is considered to be the most basic of human rights

Cultural diversity is highly valued, as is economic diversity and experimentation. Individual local and national economies vary substantially in their mix of public and private ownership and in the extent of their participation in a planetary trading system — depending on their circumstances and preferences. Experience, culture, information, and technology are freely shared among people, communities, and nations through individual travel and electronic communication, thus facilitating rapid social learning toward constant improvements in real living standards and the quality of life of all.

Each community or nation has the right to determine what and how much it will trade, with whom, and under what circumstances. Similarly it has the right to decide on the terms, if any, under which it will invite others to participate in its economy through investment. These rights, as well as other appropriate standards for an equitable and beneficial planetary trading system, are secured by international agreements implemented under the supervision of the United Nations.

Yes to Trade Rules, Markets, and Fair Trade. [Perhaps… for a while until the real benefits of localized economic efforts can gain traction and negate the need for long-haul and international transport of produce and products that can easily be produced locally.]
No to Global Capitalism and the WTO [Promoting real FREE trade?? …without the expensive banking capital controls over all finance related to trade? Is it even feasible with the present banking system? I have my doubts.]

Fair and balanced trade that serves the mutual interests of the trading partners is welcomed. However, the planetary society has a natural preference for local production to strengthen local control and economic security. [Localized management and supply also]  increases the stability and resilience of economic relations among countries. It reduces transportation costs and energy use. Another point of difference between the planetary society and the global economy is that the former takes seriously the underlying principles of market and trade theory — including the principle that markets must be regulated to maintain the conditions of efficient market function. It thus uses regulatory and fiscal measures to maintain a reasonable balance in trade between countries (exports = imports for each trading partner), assure that full costs are internalized by producers and reflected in selling prices (no direct or hidden subsidies and no unfair competitive practices such as dumping), and keep finance and ownership predominantly national (limit international financial flows and foreign/absentee ownership). In short, it takes trade rules seriously.

We often hear the advocates of free trade defend the WTO on the ground that is a source of the trade rules needed to prevent trade wars and protect the interests of poor nations. Note the contradiction. Since free trade by definition means unregulated trade, it is odd to hear self-professed free traders arguing for trade rules. In fact the WTO has no mandate to regulate international trade or the conduct of global corporations and financial markets. Its mandate is quite the opposite — to open markets by eliminating laws that restrict the free flow of trade.

The WTO was created at the behest of international corporations and financiers to prevent and roll back the regulation of trade, corporations, or finance by governments.

If one looks closely at what the WTO is actually doing and the new proposals under consideration, we see a telling pattern. For example, it has told Japan that its tax on bourbon whiskey produced in the United States is too high. Presumably the WTO believes the world will be a better place if Japanese drink more bourbon. Canada is told it cannot protect its culture by taxing U.S. magazines. India is told it cannot provide its people with inexpensive generic drugs because it is unfair to foreign drug companies that profit handsomely from branded products. The United States is told it cannot choose not to import tuna fish caught with methods harmful to dolphins. [thats one rule frankly, I would agree with! Marine biologists are warning: Tuna today, as a top ocean predator, is now so toxic from plastic pollution… consumers, if they value thier health, would be well advised to find alternatives!]

Proposals up for consideration at the next round of WTO trade negotiations would prevent governments from acting to favor local over foreign investors (including banking, media, and other service sectors), favor local firms in public procurement, preserve national food security by protecting local farmers from foreign competition, protect forest and water resources from exploitation by foreign corporations, or regulate speculative movements of international money. They would also open the way to privatizing public services such as public schools and health care.

The WTO was created at the behest of international corporations and financiers to prevent and roll back the regulation of trade, corporations, or finance by governments. As to the claim that the WTO is saving us from trade wars and protecting the interests of smaller countries in the global economy, the banana case mentioned above is instructive.

The United States decided that Europe’s import preference for bananas produced by small farmers in the Caribbean was unfair to two giant US agribusiness corporations — Chiquita and Dole — that grow bananas in Central America, control half the world’s banana trade, and make large political contributions to both the Democratic and Republican parties. The United States took the case to the WTO, which ruled in favor of the corporations and thus placed the livelihoods of some 200,000 small farmers at risk. The Europeans refused to yield and the US, acting on the WTO decision, launched a retaliatory trade war by levying massive tariffs on such things as European-made cashmere sweaters and Roquefort cheese. In one move the WTO ruled against a preference for the poor and sanctioned a retaliatory trade war, thus revealing that the professed WTO concern for trade rules, the prevention of trade wars, and the interests of the poor is nothing but smoke and mirrors.

We have desperate need of a system of rules for the global economy that reverses its destructive course and puts us on the path toward a planetary society in which life is master and money the servant. The Seattle protests called for a moratorium on negotiating any new trade agreements, review of the consequences of existing agreements, and repair of the damage already done. Post-Seattle we must craft a more comprehensive agenda aimed at creating a planetary society that works for all.

A Reform Agenda

Given that the WTO was created to move us away from, rather than toward, a planetary society, I believe it is best dismantled. Essential responsibility for economic regulation at the international level belongs in an open and democratic international body with the appropriate expertise and mandate to address complex issues from an holistic perspective on global priorities. The obvious choice is the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) of the United Nations**, which is responsible under the General Assembly for carrying out the functions of the United Nations with regard to international economic, social, cultural, education, health, and related matters. I suggest we call for an invigorated ECOSOC to build a comprehensive agenda of global economic reform involving the negotiation and implementation of strong international agreements intended to:

  • Regulate transnational corporations and finance to sharply curb financial speculation, the money laundering activities of transnational banks, trade in arms and illegal drugs, corporate tax evasion using off-shore havens, the sale abroad of chemicals and drugs banned in a corporation’s home country, and anti-competitive practices such as price-fixing cartels.
  • Establish a strong international anti-trust regime to reverse the trend toward the global concentration of corporate power, especially in such sensitive areas as banking, media, and agribusiness, and maintain competitiveness in international markets.
  • Require global corporations to adhere to the highest of international, local, or their home country standards regarding human rights, labor, environment, health, and safety everywhere they operate.
  • Monitor national trade balances and facilitate negotiations toward agreement on corrective action where consequential and persistent imbalances are found.
  • Organize sanctions in cases where a country engages in an economic assault on another by dumping products at prices substantially below the real costs of production, uses bullying tactics to force a country to open its markets to products it considers harmful or unnecessary, or intentionally disrupts the economy of another country by unilaterally imposing an economic embargo not sanctioned by the United Nations General Assembly.
  • Create mechanisms for dealing with such matters as the problem of invasive alien species like the Asian longhorn beetle, the threat to human food security created by the growing number of countries that are dependent on food imports, threats to human, economic, and environmental health posed by the reckless introduction of genetically modified organisms into food supplies and the environment, the use of child and slave labor in export production, and the abuse of intellectual property rights to overprice beneficial drugs and technologies and limit their availability to poor people and countries.

These are but a few of the real problems of international trade and investment that WTO rules ignore and in many instances worsen. Needless to say, replacing the WTO and its agenda with a more life-friendly rule-setting regime for international commerce will not be quickly achieved. It will take a massive effort of citizen education and mobilization. [The author speaks of mobilization… this site and its initiatives are exactly one of those attempts. We are actively seeking your support.]

One immediate task, beyond stopping the WTO juggernaut, will be to stop further erosion of the integrity and legitimacy of the United Nations by corporations and the International Chamber of Commerce intent on using the UN’s funding crisis to establish their influence over its decision processes for the specific purpose of precluding any action along the lines proposed here.

Those politicians who seem surprised that thoughtful citizens from around the world have mobilized to protest the WTO reveal how far out of touch they have become with real people and the human interest. Their disdain for those of us who protest and their ignorance of our views is typified by President Clinton. “You know,” he said, “every NGO, just about, with an environmental or a labor ax to grind is going to be outside the meeting room in Seattle, demonstrating against us, telling us what a terrible thing world trade is. Now I think they’re dead wrong about that.”

[There is a problem inherent to all protest today. The message of protest is often distorted by the main-stream media. It would seem to be attempting to deliberate confuse the public of the true aims of the protestors… retractions, if and when offered, are lost to the grand and noisy stage of media hyperbole. As such, much of the protest is lost to the muddle deliberately created by corporate media. Some blame click-bait profit greed, some point directly at deep-state collusion. Either way the peoples voice is lost in the hubbub. Protest is simply not enough to effect change.]

Politicians like Clinton, Al Gore, Senator Patty Murray, and others who count labor and environmentalists among their constituents, yet consider the protesters misguided and misinformed, should consider how they themselves look to the protesters — who are in fact extremely well informed about the political betrayal of the public trust represented by NAFTA, the WTO, and similar instruments of corporate rule championed by politicians we once trusted. We who protest are also voters. To the extent our very real concerns about the WTO continue to be ignored by both Democrats and Republicans, every one of us becomes a prospective Green Party voter. – ENDS.

While this last suggestion may have some benefit for the American people… should the Green Party ever be allowed to compete effectively – I feel bound to offer two warnings in regard to the above author’s conclusion. Warnings; that are equally applicable to all first world nations and those they have enormous influence over See below:

1. Such is the collusion and power of money in government today and all its bureaucratic institutions, I doubt any aspirant official or leader – who still has the ethics required to make the radical transformations to the systems that exist… would have the support within those structures to a) achieve election, or b) survive long enough to be effective.

2. The media and the ruling bureaucracy, much of it deeply embedded in the intelligence agencies of the western nations has formed a level of global shadow government which has become monolithic in nature. Those within government still seeking change are up against an immovable state machine and press-media which supports that machine without question. In American (and European) terms – the 5th estate has torn-up its social contract with the people to monitor government, becoming little more than a propaganda voice for global corporate paymasters operating beyond oversight. Today their exists a Global corporate hegemony seeking to impose its “vision” for the future, it has embedded itself so deeply it has become a juggernaut.

THC editor final note: There is today a grass-roots rising consciousness about these issues and many more. Yet little progress, if any, by what presently rules over society has been made to address them. Observers are inclined to note that the situation has in fact worsened. Among the newly conscious there also exists a strong feeling that our world is going through a transformation, one that seeks to re-ignite the virtues and values presupposed to be the driving force behind manKIND! We too believe this to be the case; that there is both hope and reason for hope, that humanity has come to the tipping point and is beginning to recognise the untapped potential of sharing, cooperation and co-creation.

At The Harmony Community we believe… evidences the process that greater society is about to undertake. We do however urge readers to take the next step and start actively supporting and living these kind of initiatives, become the change we all want to see. Align your heartfelt appraisal of present circumstances with the actions required to combat them.

**2nd Footnote; We seriously question the relevance of these organisations because the United Nations for all it’s declarations of concern… is the actually the driving force behind the globalized corporate hegemony. Its Agenda for the 21st century – The UN Sustainability Plan – reads from the corporate plan of New World Order Objectives. Efforts to address these departments within the UN – the results to date are disappointing to say the least.


David C. Korten is author of The Post-Corporate World: Life After Capitalism and When Corporations Rule the World. [At the time of writing] He is board chair of The Positive Futures Network, publishers of YES! A Journal of Positive Futures, <www.futurenet.org> and president of The People-Centered Development Forum

Leave a Reply